From Queriability to Informativity, Assessing "Quality in Use" of DBpedia and YAGO
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Linked data quality of DBpedia, Freebase, OpenCyc, Wikidata, and YAGO
In recent years, several noteworthy large, cross-domain, and openly available knowledge graphs (KGs) have been created. These include DBpedia, Freebase, OpenCyc, Wikidata, and YAGO. Although extensively in use, these KGs have not been subject to an in-depth comparison so far. In this survey, we provide data quality criteria according to which KGs can be analyzed and analyze and compare the abov...
متن کاملLinked Data Quality of DBpedia , Freebase ,
In recent years, several noteworthy large, cross-domain, and openly available knowledge graphs (KGs) have been created. These include DBpedia, Freebase, OpenCyc, Wikidata, and YAGO. Although extensively in use, these KGs have not been subject to an in-depth comparison so far. In this survey, we provide data quality criteria according to which KGs can be analyzed and analyze and compare the abov...
متن کاملOne Knowledge Graph to Rule Them All? Analyzing the Differences Between DBpedia, YAGO, Wikidata & co
Public Knowledge Graphs (KGs) on the Web are considered a valuable asset for developing intelligent applications. They contain general knowledge which can be used, e.g., for improving data analytics tools, text processing pipelines, or recommender systems. While the large players, e.g., DBpedia, YAGO, or Wikidata, are often considered similar in nature and coverage, there are, in fact, quite a ...
متن کاملA Comparative Survey of DBpedia, Freebase, OpenCyc, Wikidata, and YAGO
In recent years, several noteworthy large, crossdomain and openly available knowledge graphs (KGs) have been created. These include DBpedia, Freebase, OpenCyc, Wikidata, and YAGO. Although extensively in use, these KGs have not been subject to an in-depth comparison so far. In this survey, we first define aspects according to which KGs can be analyzed. Next, we analyze and compare the above men...
متن کاملTwo Is Bigger (and Better) Than One: the Wikipedia Bitaxonomy Project
We present WiBi, an approach to the automatic creation of a bitaxonomy for Wikipedia, that is, an integrated taxonomy of Wikipage pages and categories. We leverage the information available in either one of the taxonomies to reinforce the creation of the other taxonomy. Our experiments show higher quality and coverage than state-of-the-art resources like DBpedia, YAGO, MENTA, WikiNet and WikiTa...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016